Reference-First.Com | Article Video Directory Logo  
Reference First - Article & Video Directory
Online Knowledge Directory  
Knowledge Base Home Knowledge Base Home | Sign Up as Writer Sign Up | Knowledge Base Glossary Glossary | Contact Us Contact Us | Member LoginLogin
Home > All Categories > Travel, Fun & Leisure > Movies & TV > My View Of The Kingdom of Heaven's Director's Cut
Question Title My View Of The Kingdom of Heaven's Director's Cut

It's The Kingdom of Heaven: Director’s Cut Now

I watched the "Kingdom of Heaven: Director’s Cut" over the weekend.
Over all, I thought it was interesting, well developed, and had incredible graphics. In fact, it was probably one of the best dvd movies I have seen this summer.

Orlando Bloom fit the lead role perfectly, and the leading lady (sorry I can’t think of her name just now) was also quite strong in her role. I believe this was the first time I had seen her on screen and, admittedly, it was nice to have someone play the part who was not a Hollywood icon. I like to see new faces with authentic accents in historically based films set in foreign lands.

At the introduction of the movie, the Director came on and talked a little about why this cut was not used in theaters. He mentioned that some thought certain parts were too long and drawn out. However, I didn’t see any of this when watching the movie. I have not seen the theater version, so I have nothing to compare it to. However, there was not a single scene in the Director’s Cut version that I felt was so long it lost my interest.

As for the graphics… Everything from the flesh and blood in fighting scenes, to the panoramic views of landscapes and scenery, to the close-ups of facial expressions was filmed with great thought and attention to detail. The pictures were thought provoking and added to the over all significance of the scene.

One thing I like about movies set in historically significant time periods is to have some sort of background information displayed at the beginning, something to “set the scene” for the part of history in which we are about to embark. That was one small thing I felt was missing from this film, although it did include a similar feature at the end. My only other complaint (and a minor one at that) is that, even though this was the Director’s Cut version, the movie had boring bonus features.

Usually dvd movies have interesting or even interactive bonus features. However, there was no filmography included for actors or staff, no “making of” (which I thought particularly unusual for a Director’s cut version), and no interviews with the actors about the film either.
 
Is it worth buying then?
Authored by: William This question has been viewed 215 times so far.
Click Here to View all the questions in Movies & TV category.
File Attachments File Attachments
There are no attachment file(s) related to this question.
How helpful was this article to you?
User Comments User Comments Add Comment
There are no user comments for this question. Be the first to post a comment. Click Here
Related Questions Related Questions
  1. My Review Of Underworld Evolution
  2. Fools Gold Movie Review
  3. This Is Spinal Tap Special Edition DVD
  4. DVD Review - Love in the time of Cholera
Article Information Additional Information
Article Number: 28
Created: 2008-08-14 2:41 PM
Rating: No Rating
 
Article Options Article Options
Print Question Print this Question
Email Question Email Question to Friend
Export to Adobe PDF Export to PDF File
Export to MS Word Export to MS Word
Bookmark Article
del.icio.us Bookmark del.icio.us Bookmark
Reditt Bookmark Reditt Bookmark
Digg Bookmark Digg Bookmark
Technorati Bookmark Add to Technorati
StumbleUpon Bookmark Stumble Upon Bookmark
Subscribe to Article Subscribe to Article
 
Search Knowledge Base Search Knowledge Base
 
 

Brought To You By Reference-First.Com Article Directory